Uncategorized

February 2024: Meeting writeup

The fifth talk of the 191st session of Manchester Statistical Society was delivered by Dr Chris Jones of Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of Manchester, who dealt with the important question is how local targets for mitigating climate change are set.

Tackling climate change requires adopting a lot of change changes required to housing infrastructure, transportation and food systems amongst others. These changes however involve high cost, and any decisions about local emission targets – and indeed national or global targets – should be based on evidence-based policies to enable the city region to create evidence-based policy to create policy and direct investment to respond better to climate change. Ultimately, the actions that are adopted are based on the target.

Greater Manchester has set its own targets within the broader requirements of a fair local contribution to keeping global warming to below 2°C. Against that overarching objective, Greater Manchester’s carbon budget was set based on science-based targets and an understanding of the relationship between CO2 emissions and pursuing potential mitigation efforts. A key principle from the Paris Accords, namely the “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities” was used to estimate Greater Manchester’s share of the UK’s carbon budget. This equates to a carbon budget of 71 MtCO2 between 2018 and 2038 and reach carbon neutrality by 2038. In practice, achieving that target requires reducing carbon emissions by 15% per annum over that 20-year period.

At a macro level, the cost of climate change impact our weight the transition costs. For e.g. when housing stock becomes more efficient, we save on energy costs. In other words, investment made on transitioning measures does offer a return, albeit in the long term.

Actual emissions, however, expose the harsh reality that sticking to the targets is extremely hard. In no year since 2018 have we been able to reduce emissions by 15% in GM. The situation is similar nationally and globally. Dr Jones ended his talk by calling for bold measures and a policy framework that brings together spatial, industrial and environmental planning. It also requires close collaboration between public authorities, business, transport providers and healthcare organisations amongst others. Change is certainly needed because missing the targets comes with huge societal costs and not addressing climate change as a matter of urgency will have impact on human living as early as in the next decade.

Written by Subrahmaniam Krishnan-Harihara on behalf of Manchester Statistical Society

Continue reading

Related from the archive

Uncategorized

AI Study Group: February 2026

Building with Generative AI: The Tricks and Tips You Need to Avoid Common Pitfalls Ian Massingham Ian introduces his background in cloud computing, starting at AWS in 2013 and witnessing its rapid European growth. After roles at MongoDB and a data startup, he joined early-stage Griptape. Initially focused on building a

Read article
News

AI Study Group: December 2025

MSS AI Study Group Meeting on 16 December 2025 Practical Frameworks for Industrial AI by Dr Jack Saunders In Practical Frameworks for Industrial AI, Dr Jack Saunders, Technical Director at Trident Intelligent Solutions, presents a pragmatic, outcome-focused approach to delivering AI in complex and regulated environment

Read article
News

AI Study Group: November 2025

MSS AI Study Group Meeting on 18 November 2025 Part 1. Dr. Guy Marshall introduces HAILIE Summary Dr. Guy Marshall sets the scene by explaining why HAILIE (the Housing AI Leadership and Implementation Exchange) was created: to give housing professionals a no-sales forum to move beyond hype and work together on the prac

Read article